Examining the Relationship Between Principals’ Supportive Work Environment Practices and Teacher Burnout in Pakistani Public Schools

Authors

  • Muqaddas Mehmood PhD Education, Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Sumaira Munawar HOD, Department of Education, Lahore Leads University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Iram Muzzamil Assistant Professor, Department of Education, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v4i3.306

Keywords:

Teacher Burnout, Supportive Leadership, Principals, Public Schools, Pakistan

Abstract

Teacher burnout is a critical issue in educational systems worldwide, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. In Pakistan, public sector teachers are particularly vulnerable due to overcrowded classrooms, limited resources, and high administrative pressures. School principals, as instructional and organizational leaders, play a pivotal role in shaping work environments that can either exacerbate or mitigate burnout. This study investigates the relationship between principals’ supportive work environment practices and teacher burnout among secondary school teachers in Pakistani public schools. Using a correlational research design, data were collected from 300 secondary school teachers in the district Lahore and Sheikhupura through the Maslach Burnout Inventory–Educators Survey (MBI-ES) and the Supportive Work Environment Practices Scale (SWEP). Results indicated a significant positive correlation (r = .56, p<.001) between supportive practices and burnout Findings suggest that principals’ recognition of teachers, workload management, and emotional support play a crucial role in reducing burnout.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-21

How to Cite

Mehmood, M. ., Munawar, S. ., & Muzzamil, I. . (2025). Examining the Relationship Between Principals’ Supportive Work Environment Practices and Teacher Burnout in Pakistani Public Schools . Journal of Social and Organizational Matters, 4(3), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v4i3.306

Issue

Section

Articles